Page 2 of 14

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:48 pm
by fig
Chris wrote:
fig wrote:Much better than a POS T5. :roll:
And I learn something new! :D
Pity it had to be the hard way! :twisted:

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:49 pm
by Chris
True,but not again! :wink:

You'll see it at the KKKaK.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:32 am
by karmakoma
Nice on Chris!

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:20 pm
by Bugger
HAPPY for you con grats :hangloose: :hangloose:

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:27 pm
by Fightercombi
Nice ride Chris. Glad you got sorted with transport.

Cheers :drunks:

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:54 am
by Watercool
Congrats my friend, it looks like a sweet pick up. Sorry we never saw them over here, but then we don't like to lift stuff that high to load. and it was not available in 4x4.
But sweet, happy for you.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:49 pm
by Dawie
Nice Chris!

On the plus side, it has a huge storage area,where something can be left safely, out of the eyesight of criminals. Carries a full 1000kg. Longer loading area than their competition.

Remember some Ford F100 and Dodge pickups of the time only had a 750kg capacity. They had a wider turning circle than a VW,could'nt make the hairpin bends of narrow service roads in the mountains to service radio repeater sites where the VW just could. On a rainy day the front engined 2wd Fords could'nt make it up slippery muddy roads,unlike the VW's.

With only a 3-speed gearbox,and massive engines,the U.S. pickups consumed about 10 miles per US gallon,(24l/100km), nearly twice as much as the VW's. In Namibia, a common conversion was to fit a Deutz aircooled diesel engine in the F100 to reduce fuel consumption.

So at the time the VW's were better suited to countries where fuel has always been way more expensive than in the US. Must say the Ford's soft suspension was comfortable and it was faster.

A case of different horses for different courses.And the S.A. course was very different from the U.S. one.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:59 am
by Chris
Thanks guys. :P

Interesting facts! Thanks Dawie.

Although I must ad that the suspension on this SC is very soft due to the IRS and soft front suspension.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:34 am
by calooker
Nice Chris, I want one, :D been looking but most are so beat up that they are just not worth the trouble.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:52 pm
by Chris
Last weekend I got 4 Rosstyles from BAB.Today I took them to have the tires fitted and then sprayed the wheels black.

Before
Image

After
Image
Image

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:21 pm
by Tony Z
looking good!!

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:23 pm
by Bad Ass Bob
Glad i could help :hangloose: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:02 pm
by hitlers revenge
Now you just need some trim rings.

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:16 pm
by Chris
Have you got? :mrgreen:

Re: My Lowlight SC

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:04 pm
by karmakoma
Looking good, now slap a roofrack on it, and the aforementioned trim rings, and you are on your way to a resto cal.